Although there are many woke issues and a culture war is in progress, the biggest concern in that category lies in the transgender area. Just by using the new labels (such as transgender woman, birthing person or cisgender) or preferred pronouns that have displaced the correct ones, we are giving legitimacy to this fraudulent set-up. In some cases, coercion tactics are used to threaten and force the usage of erroneous terms.
How did the world get to this point in just a few years?
Investigative journalist Jennifer Bilek has been studying this topic and traced the origins to two American transhumanists—William Bainbridge and Martine Rothblatt. In her interview with James Patrick, Bileck shares what she has learnt following her research. Her sentences are punctuated with you knows which can be annoying, but, other than that, she has a story to tell.
This project has, you know, is backed by big finance, big pharma, big tech and, and all the corporations, international corporations, international finance houses, international law firms, they’re all driving the same narrative. And you have to ask yourself, why would this happen in the span of ten years?
. . . And when you follow the money, like I do, you find the answers. It’s all going to the tech sector, to the, you know, they want to take over human reproduction with technology.
Who are the powers-that-be behind this operation?
This is totally a top-down arrangement of power and it comes, again, from the highest echelons of society, and finance, and then the owner of . . . the founder of Outright Leadership, which is the business networking arm of the LGB, comes out of banking. The guy that runs it comes out of banking. You know, Jon Stryker, head of Arcus Foundation, comes out of banking. There’s no Harvey Milk character here, do you know what I mean? There’s no grassroots activist here. These are all uber businessmen.
So you have a profiteering motive.
The money trail provides the clues.
I started following the money around this issue because if you want to know anything in America, you follow the money, right? And so I started following the money and I looked at all these different NGOs, these non-governmental organisations that were really huge. They were huge, like Arcus Foundation and Gill Foundation. They’re mammoth. They’ve each given like a half a billion dollars to spread this ideology through the cultures, you know, not just our culture, but, you know, Western cultures, because they fund other organisations that do the same thing . . .
She explains the role of media and politicians.
You have media people, you have people that are being trained in politics to get them into political institutions like the Victory Institute, for instance, that’s funded very heavily by Arcus Foundation. And like, for instance, Rachel Levine was part of that organisation. You know, they call people from different schools and different areas that are going to work for them, and then they train them to be in these positions to drive policy through the culture, right? Which Levine is doing, if you’ve seen him speak.
And so then they have media people as well, like GLAAD is the media arm. So GLAAD and Arcus Foundation are closely working together and GLAAD goes about spreading information about how people are supposed to talk about this, because it’s a human right and you don’t want to offend anybody, right?
GLAAD was set-up in 1985 and states its mission as ensuring fair, accurate, and inclusive representation that rewrites the script for LGBTQ acceptance.
Who is calling the shots?
So the message comes from on high. And what I mean by ‘on high’ is not Arcus Foundation, I mean Stryker Medical. $17.1billion corporation and growing by the day, in 75 different countries. The medical industrial complex is bigger than the military industrial complex.
So I’ve picked out a few different characters that are very, very prominent and are doing a lot of work to change society and to change people’s minds, to drive this techno-religion through our society. But there are many, many others, whether or not they actually know what they’re doing, it’s not quite clear to me, but they, most of them, come out of the techno-medical industry, the banking industry. . .
This is all pharma, tech and big finance, you know? BlackRock, Vanguard. The ideology is just so patently ridiculous.
A commenter to this article, on the same topic, summed up the situation we are facing.
We are living through Godless times. I realise it sounds trite and old fashioned, but consider this. The World didn’t suddenly flip from wide-eyed optimism in the ’80s to despair in 40 years without an awful lot of chess pieces being moved incrementally during those years. There is no ‘cock-up’ theory to cover such malevolence applied on such a scale to humanity, as we are witnessing today.
They are perverts who are targetting children.
Florida Activists Secretly Ship Free Sex-Change Kits to Children Around the Country
How A Left-Wing Activist Group Teamed Up With Big Pharma
To Push Radical Gender Ideology on American Hospitals
The Human Rights Campaign’s Healthcare Equality Index, bankrolled by Pfizer, is changing our medical care
This is Bud Light’s ‘nightmare from hell’: Kevin O’Leary | Fox News Rundown
There are a great many news articles and clips related to the Trans Agenda. They need to be shared so others understand how devious and evil it is and how it has gained such a stronghold all over the world.
I’ll add as much as possible in this thread rather than the Open Thread as it is connected to this Post topic.
It’s the funding, stupid
The credit for the nightmare that Bud Light is facing should go to a twitter brigade – grassroots activists – who spread the word and the conservatives who acted on it.
As mentioned elsewhere, there are some “conservative” Republicans who did not support the boycott, and there are some “conservative-leaning” outlets that referred to Mulvaney as a “she”.
Bud Light Boycott Is Working,
Anheuser-Busch Ex-Executive Says
Trans influencers find it harder to get deals
after Bud Light’s Dylan Mulvaney fiasco
The next target of the grassroots movement is the Target stores.
Customers Call for ‘Bud Light Treatment’ of Target
Over Transgender Line of Children’s Clothes
How they are trying to take over.
“Del sits down with Luka, an advocate for protecting kids from gender medicine, who herself medically transitioned as a teen before transitioning back to a female. Hear her trying journey telling of how the medical and trans communities have turned their backs on her.”
EofT, thanks for joining in and sharing that link. Glad to have others add to the info on the subject.
Del asks about the physician who helped facilitate this transition.
You feel abandoned by the medical community. … they are more than happy to put you on this path where you would have been reliant on them for the rest of your life.
Follow the money. They don’t care about the well-being of the vulnerable young people they are deceiving. They are raking in the dollars with the surgeries and medications, and will continue to do so for the rest of their victims’ lives. More victims, more money.
Chloe Cole has a similar story
Change, Surgery, and Regret, A Story of Detransition
The biggest concern is the attack on free speech. Everything else cascades from that.
A public school. The school appoints on its staff a tranny who is allowed into classes to talk to the school children (Free speech). Talks about sex, gender, porn, transition. How to do it, where to do it and you don’t need to tell your parents about it.
Parents hear about it, later. They come to the school and protest and complain (Free speech).
The entire alphabet soup is allowed into the school to speak to the kids (Free speech) and parents are allowed to complain (Free speech).
Don’t like it? Find another school. The permission to do this comes from way high up. Free speech for all. But who enjoys the real power? How did that happen?
“Jane” (say 10 -14 years old) with an unstable home life. Alcoholic mother, drug-addict father. Jane has come to believe that she is the cause of the problems at home, and if she was a boy, then all would be well.
A relative/neighbour who is tranny befriends Jane (Free speech) and learns what is troubling her. Encourages Jane to think that if she becomes a boy the family problems will end and Jane will be happy again (Free speech). Easy enough for a young girl to believe that such a transition is a simple magic fix.
So vulnerable Jane, with parents who don’t care, thinks she has found someone who really loves her and gets taken down the route of very nice, caring doctors, hormones and surgery.
A concerned neighbour may learn about this and complain to authorities, media and politicians. (Free speech)
Who wins? Not the good neighbour. Definitely not Jane. The system from high up has it all set.
The company was within its Free speech rights to advertise a product using trannies. The problem that they did not foresee was that the conservative public would not just use their Free speech to complain and whinge but actually unite in a boycott of the product.
Free speech is important but how it is used is of greater import.
We can sit behind our keyboards/keypads and post on social media, forums or write letters to papers. We can complain on radio shows and TV programs. We can stand at street corners and talk about it.
But that talk is cheap and empty unless it translates into action, in a very big way – hitting companies, politicians and anyone else where it hurts the most – the bottom line/ the wallet.
What happened in the case of Bud Light is the public action to do something and decide that they would not buy the product – a collective decision plus a united action and a message clearly-received by the company.
More about that in the Open Thread.
We need to start making lists of transgender activists so we can lawfare against them.