Guest Post by A special correspondent
Welcome to the second phase of the Great Reset: war.
While the pandemic acclimatised the world to lockdowns, normalised the acceptance of experimental medications, precipitated the greatest transfer of wealth to corporations by decimating SMEs and adjusted the muscle memory of workforce operations in preparation for a cybernetic future, an additional vector was required to accelerate the economic collapse before nations can ‘Build Back Better.’
I present below several ways in which the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine is the next catalyst for the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset agenda, facilitated by an interconnected web of global stakeholders and a diffuse network of public-private partnerships.
1. The war between Russia and Ukraine is already causing unprecedented disruption to global supply chains, exacerbating fuel shortages and inducing chronic levels of inflation.
As geopolitical tensions morph into a protracted conflict between NATO and the Sino-Russia axis, a second contraction may plunge the economy into stagflation.
In the years ahead, the combination of subpar growth and runaway inflation will force a global economic underclass into micro-work contracts and low-wage jobs in an emerging gig economy.
Another recession will compound global resource thirst, narrow the scope for self-sufficiency and significantly increase dependence on government subsidies.
With the immiseration of a significant portion of the world’s labour force looming on the horizon, this may well be a prelude to the introduction of a Universal Basic Income, leading to a highly stratified neo-feudal order.
Therefore, the World Economic Forum’s ominous prediction that we will ‘own nothing and be happy’ by 2030 seems to be unfolding with horrifying rapidity.
2. The war’s economic fallout will lead to a dramatic downsizing of the global workforce.
The architects of the Great Reset have anticipated this trend for a number of years and will exploit this economic turbulence by propelling the role of disruptive technologies to meet global challenges and fundamentally alter traditional business patterns to keep pace with rapid changes in technology.
Like the pandemic, disaster preparedness in the age of conflict will rest significantly on the willingness to embrace specific technological innovations in the public and private spheres so that future generations can supply the labour demands of the Great Reset.
A recurring theme in Klaus Schwab’s Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution is that groundbreaking technological and scientific innovations will no longer be relegated to the physical world around us but become extensions of ourselves.
He emphasises the primacy of emerging technologies in a next generation workforce and highlights the urgency to push ahead with plans to digitise several aspects of the global labour force through scalable technology based solutions.
Those spearheading the Great Reset seek to manage geopolitical risk by creating new markets which revolve around digital innovations, e-strategies, telepresence labour, Artificial Intelligence, robotics, nanotechnology, the Internet of Things and the Internet of Bodies.
The breakneck speed in which AI technologies are being deployed suggest that the optimization of such technologies will initially bear on traditional industries and professions which offer a safety net for hundreds of millions of workers, such as farming, retail, catering, manufacturing and the courier industries.
However, automation in the form of robots, smart software and machine learning will not be limited to jobs which are routine, repetitive and predictable.
AI systems are on the verge of wholesale automation of various white collar jobs, particularly in areas which involve information processing and pattern recognition such as accounting, HR and middle management positions.
Although anticipating future employment trends is no easy task, it’s safe to say that the combined threat of pandemics and wars means the labour force is on the brink of an unprecedented reshuffle with technology reshaping logistics, potentially threatening hundreds of millions of blue and white collar jobs, resulting in the greatest and fastest displacement of jobs in history and foreshadowing a labour market shift which was previously inconceivable.
While it has long been anticipated that the increased use of technology in the private sector would result in massive job losses, pandemic lockdowns and the coming disruption caused by a war will speed up this process, and many companies will be left with no other option but to lay off staff and replace them with creative technological solutions merely for the survival of their businesses.
In other words, many of the jobs which will be lost in the years ahead were already moving towards redundancy and are unlikely to be recovered once the dust is settled.
3. The war has significantly reduced Europe’s reliance on the Russian energy sector and reinforced the centrality of the UN Sustainable Development Goals and ‘net zero‘ emissions which lies at the heart of the Great Reset.
Policymakers marching lockstep with the Great Reset have capitalised on the tough sanctions against Russia by accelerating the shift towards ‘green’ energy and reiterating the importance of decarbonisation as part of the ‘fight against climate change’.
However, it would be very short-sighted to assume that the Great Reset is ultimately geared towards the equitable distribution of ‘green’ hydrogen and carbon-neutral synthetic fuels replacing petrol & diesel.
While UN SDGs are crucial to post-pandemic recovery, more importantly, they are fundamental to the makeover of shareholder capitalism which is now being vaunted by the Davos elites as ‘stakeholder capitalism’.
In economic terms, this refers to a system where governments are no longer the final arbiters of state policies as unelected private corporations become the de facto trustees of society, taking on the direct responsibility to address the world’s social, economic and environmental challenges through macroeconomic cooperation and a multi-stakeholder model of global governance.
Under such an economic construct, asset holding conglomerates can redirect the flow of global capital by aligning investments with the UN’s SDGs and configuring them as Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG) compliant so that new international markets can be built on the disaster and misery of potentially hundreds of millions of people reeling from the economic collapse caused by war.
Therefore, the war offers a huge impetus for the governments pushing the reset to actively pursue energy independence, shape markets towards ‘green and inclusive growth’ and eventually move populations towards a cap-and-trade system, otherwise known as a carbon credit economy.
This will centralise power in the hands of stakeholder capitalists under the benevolent guise of reinventing capitalism through fairer and greener means, using deceptive slogans like ‘Build Back Better’ without sacrificing the perpetual growth imperative of capitalism.
4. Food shortages created by the war will offer a major boon to the synthetic biology industry as the convergence of digital technologies with materials science and biology will radically transform the agricultural sector and encourage the adoption of plant-based and lab-grown alternatives on a global scale.
Russia and Ukraine are both bread baskets of the world and critical shortages in grains, fertilisers, vegetable oils and essential foodstuffs will catapult the importance of biotechnology to food security and sustainability and give birth to several imitation meat start-ups similar to ‘Impossible Foods’ which was co-funded by Bill Gates.
One can therefore expect more government regulation to usher a dramatic overhaul to industrial food production and cultivation, ultimately benefiting agribusiness and biotech investors, since food systems will be redesigned through emerging technologies to grow ‘sustainable’ proteins and CRISPR gene-edited patented crops.
5. Russia’s exclusion from SWIFT (The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication) foreshadows an economic reset which will generate precisely the kind of blowback necessary for corralling large swathes of the global population into a technocratic control grid.
As several economists have opined, weaponizing SWIFT, CHIPS (The Clearing House Interbank Payments System) and the US Dollar against Russia will only spur geopolitical rivals like China to accelerate the process of de-dollarisation.
The main benefactor of economic sanctions against Russia appears to be China which can reshape the Eurasian market by encouraging member states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) and BRICS to bypass the SWIFT ecosystem and settle cross-border international payments in the Digital Yuan.
While the demand for cryptocurrencies will see a massive spike, this is likely to encourage many governments to increasingly regulate the sector through public blockchains and enforce a multilateral ban on decentralised cryptocurrencies.
The shift to crypto could be the dress rehearsal to eventually expedite plans for programmable money overseen by a federal regulator, leading to the greater accretion of power in the hands of a powerful global technocracy and thus sealing our enslavement to financial institutions.
I believe this war will bring currencies to parity, therefore heralding a new Bretton Woods moment which promises to transform the operation of international banking and macroeconomic cooperation through the future adoption of central bank digital currencies.
6. This war marks a major inflection point in the globalist aspiration for a new international rules based order anchored in Eurasia.
As the ‘father of geopolitics’ Halford Mackinder opined over a century ago, the rise of every global hegemon in the past 500 years has been possible because of dominance over Eurasia. Similarly, their decline has been associated with losing control over that pivotal landmass.
This causal connection between geography and power has not gone unnoticed by the global network of stakeholders representing the WEF, many of whom have anticipated the transition to a multipolar era and return to great power competition amid America’s receding political and economic influence and a pressing need for what technocrats call smart globalisation.
While America tries desperately to cling to its superpower status, China’s economic ascent and Russia’s regional ambitions threaten to upend the strategic axial points of Eurasia (Western Europe and Asia Pacific).
The region in which America previously enjoyed uncontested hegemony is no longer impervious to cracks and we may be witnessing a changing of the guard which dramatically alters the calculus of global force projection.
Although China’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has the potential to unify the world-island (Asia, Africa and Europe) and cause a tectonic shift in the locus of global power, the recent invasion of Ukraine will have far-reaching consequences for China-Europe rail freight.
The Ukrainian President Zelensky claimed that Ukraine could function as the BRI’s gateway to Europe. Therefore, we cannot ignore China’s huge stake in the recent tensions over Ukraine, nor can we ignore NATO’s underlying ambition to check China’s rise in the region by limiting the sale of Ukrainian assets to China and doing everything in its capacity to thwart The Modern Silk Road.
As sanctions push Russia towards consolidating bilateral ties with China and fully integrating with the BRI, a Pan-Eurasian trading bloc may be the realignment which forces a shared governance of the global commons and a reset to the age of US exceptionalism.
7. With speculation mounting over the war’s long term impact on bilateral trade flows between China and Europe, the Russia-Ukraine conflict will catapult Israel – a leading advocate of the Great Reset – to even greater international prominence.
Israel is a highly attractive BRI market for China and the CCP is acutely aware of Israel’s importance as a strategic outpost connecting the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea through the Gulf of Suez.
Furthermore, the Chinese government has for many years acknowledged the primacy of Israel as a global technology hub and capitalised on Israel’s innovation capabilities to help meet its own strategic challenges.
Therefore, Naftali Bennet’s mediation between Moscow and Kiev is likely to factor the instrumental role of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in expanding both China and Israel’s regional and global strategic footprint.
Israel’s status as among the leading tech hubs of the future and gateway connecting Europe and the Middle East is inextricably tied to the web of physical infrastructures, such as roads, railways, ports and energy pipelines which China has been building over the past decade.
Already a powerhouse in auto-technologies, robotics and cybersecurity, Israel aspires to be the central nation in the millennial Kingdom and the country’s tech startups are predicted to play a key role in the fourth industrial revolution.
Strengthening its evolving relationship with China amid the Russia-Ukraine crisis could help propel Israel into a regional hegemon par excellence with a large share of centralised economic and technological power converging in Jerusalem.
As Israel embarks on efforts to diversify its export markets and investments away from the United States, it begs an important question.
Is Israel in the formative stages of outsourcing its security interests away from the US and hedging its bets on the Sino-Russia axis?
8. It is now common knowledge that Digital IDs are a central plank in the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset agenda and are to be streamlined across industries, supply chains and markets as a way of advancing the UN 2030 SDGs and delivering individualised and integrated services in future smart cities.
Many have cottoned on to how such a platform can be used to usher in a global system of technocratic population control and compliance by incorporating humanity into a new corporate value chain where citizens are mined as data commodities for ESG investors and human capital bond markets and assigned a social and climate score based on how well they measure up against the UN SDGs.
This seamless verification of people and connected devices in smart environments can only take place once our biometrics, health records, finances, education transcripts, consumer habits, carbon footprint and the entire sum of human experiences is stored on an interoperable database to determine our conformity with the UN SDGs, thus forcing a monumental change to our social contract.
Vaccine passports were initially touted by public-private partnerships as an entry point for Digital IDs. Now that such a logic has run its course, how might the present geopolitical tensions contribute to scaling what is the key node in a new digital ecosystem?
Ukraine has traditionally been called Europe’s bread basket and alongside Russia, both nations are major global suppliers of staple grains. Therefore, the war has all the makings of a black swan for commodities and inflation.
With an economy teetering on the brink of collapse due to a global supply crunch, I believe the resulting economic tremors will trigger wartime emergencies across the world and the public will be told to brace themselves for rationing.
Once this takes place, the multilateral adoption of Digital IDs which interface with Central Bank Digital Currencies can be touted as the solution to efficiently manage and distribute household rations under an unprecedented state of emergency and exception.
The Bank of England has already floated the prospect of programmable cash which can only be spent on essentials or goods which an employer or government deem sensible.
Once the issuer is granted control over how it is spent by the recipient, it will become nigh impossible to function adequately without a Digital ID, which will be required to receive food parcels and obtain a basic means of subsistence. Think UBI (Universal Basic Income).
If food inflation continues on an upward trajectory with no signs of abating, governments may institute price controls in the form of rationing and ration entries could be logged on blockchain ledgers on the Digital ID to track our carbon footprint and consumptive habits during a national emergency.
9. Europe is directly in the line of fire once a hybrid war between NATO and the Sino-Russia axis is underway.
It would be remiss to ignore the clear and present danger posed by a cyber attack on banks and critical infrastructure or even a tentative and tactical nuclear exchange with intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).
I can’t see how any warring party will not be limited by the doctrine of mutually assured destruction so a thermonuclear fallout is unlikely.
However, the use of remote access technologies to erase system memory from the SWIFT banking apparatus or Cross-Border Interbank Payment System can potentially render much of the international economy non-operational and send the dollar into a tailspin.
If an event of such cataclysmic proportions was to occur, it will undoubtedly lead to increasing demands to overhaul cyber security.
The fallout from such an event could very well establish a new global security protocol according to which citizens must possess a Digital ID as a necessary national security measure.
One can imagine how accessing the internet or public services in the aftermath of a nationwide cyber attack may require citizens to use a Digital ID to authenticate that their online activities and transactions are from a legitimate and non-malicious source.
There are few coincidences in politics.
10. The economic implications of this war will be so disastrous that governments and the public sector will require a significant injection of private capital to address the financing shortfall.
This will effectively render the traditional separation of powers between central banking institutions and governments obsolete, as the former will be positioned to disproportionately influence the fiscal trajectory of nation states, whose sovereignty will be hollowed out by the wholesale capture of governments by the central banks and hedge funds.
Therefore, the nation state model is gradually being upended by a global technocracy, consisting of an unelected consortium of leaders of industry, central banking oligarchs and private financial institutions, most of which are predominantly non-state corporate actors attempting to restructure global governance and enlist themselves in the global decision-making process.
Therefore, the future of international relations and the social, economic and political transformation which the world is presently undergoing in light of the pandemic and Russia-Ukraine conflict will not be decided through multilateralism and elected representatives of sovereign states.
Rather, it will be decided through a network of multi-stakeholder partnerships which are motivated by the politics of expediency and not accountable to any electorate or beholden to any state and for whom concepts like sovereignty and international law are meaningless.
This article has been republished with permission from Winter Oak.
Ten years ago, the points listed in this article would have been dismissed as bizarre and far-fetched.
Would you have imagined then, that some years later, we would be required to wear a mask to step out of our homes, scan some code to allow us to enter the supermarket to buy our groceries, get jabbed with some unknown substance in order to hang on to our jobs or take part in everyday activities?
That we would not be allowed to meet friends in a park, or go to church, or visit dying family members and attend their funerals?
Has our “government”signed on to the UN agreement about the WHO being able to declare a state of emergency, binding on all signatory governments?
This will make it easy for the likes of Scummo to acquiesce to all his puppeter’s commands – all the machinery & personnel are still in place in Australia
IIRC a Public commenter on YouTube recently described war as “politics by other means” – the last resort option, that of “gunboat diplomacy” presumably.
Naivete ripe for the picking.
According to their Charter, the WHO answer to ‘Elf Ministers – blame Greg Crunt.
Carl von Clausewitz
Good to see the little runt copping a proverbial flogging.
Trudeau’s evisceration in EU Parliament: His foreign critics are more effective than Canadian ones
Oops, wrong thread.
the WHO being able to declare a state of emergency, binding on all signatory governments?
According to their Charter, the WHO answer to ‘Elf Ministers – blame Greg Crunt.
I thought there is a “treaty” going round for all the governments to sign to give the WHO the power to declare a state of emergency.
Dunno if our mob have signed it yet, but I’m sure they will.
According to the Bible, this global technocratic world domination plan (Babylon) will be demolished through divine intervention. We will then go through a phase, seven years to be precise, of primitive barbarity, there won’t be any technology in that world. Prepare for a bumpy ride before things get better.
I get the impression the special correspondent is a bit pro the Schwabian future.That is to say one of neo-feudal technocracy. Perhaps it could be said that the article is intentionally or unintentionally an “infomercial”. The author somewhat brainwashed by what is referred these days in general as 5D warfare. Core of the effect of this brainwashing being the superimposition of allegation/ delusion that there exist no alternative future than the artificial one that the WEF and Co are attempting to jam down the throat of the populace. It is inherently implausible to argue that the suggested specific global outcomes are likely or certain as a response to artificial and manufactured effectors.
Returning to basic engineering concepts of feedback loops and compartmentalisation of mass/ energy flow into idealised and theoretical systems. Might work to design a toaster or automobile. To some extent financial systems with a whole lot of unpredictability and error. Ultimately such compartmentalised systems no matter the extent to which such systems are adaptable and have the capacity to evolve in response to feedback, these systems remain idealisations based on models.
A model is exactly that. A “picture” of reality. Same old limiting issue for the human mind relevant to and represented as a subset of computing systems and the desire to develop manifestations of what is referred to as AI. That the human mind is just as limited as a computing machine is by the Turing principle. That is is not necessary and more often than not is all pervasive with any computing system, that this computing machine does not necessarily have to, or is able to understand the symbols/ values which it has been instructed to process. The misguided idea you can design something with the human mind that can manifest as greater than the human mind. Efficient does not equal intelligent.
Constructing technologies to manipulate mass transfer within idealised compartmentalised systems, no matter the reductions in error and temporal/ spatial limitations on information transfer offered by networking and perhaps approximations of instantaneous communication- there is the underlying reality that the imagined system is going to be as subject to the flaws and errors introduced by the creator(s) of that system.That is to say people that are by definition flawed and prone to error.
The UN sustainable development goals referred to above imply the absurd. That is to say the suggestion that humans and their technology respectively even remotely understand the constraints of, and are able to manipulate reality.The ridiculous notion that some old bald guy with a bust of Lenin in his office, be he but a front man for others, can resurrect communism on a global scale to the benefit and well being of all and the indefinite maintenance of all life on Earth(?)
The “agenda” is fundamentally flawed, far from a given, has everything to do with imposition of control and zero to do with anything else. But a grand delusion that is nothing but the fantasy of sick minds that do not in any represent at all the needs, hopes, desires, will and dreams of the human mind. Individually or collectively.
The grand deception in play is seemingly testing the water for how to convince the populace that the WEF agenda enmeshed with occlusion and confusion of the plain evil this agenda requires as prerequisite- is what they want.
The irony, with reference to the financial Telco system, SWIFT, is that a former Kraut incarnation, the infamous “Enigma machine”, was designed as a financial cypher system well before the war.
If AI bots take out HR, I’m all for it – I note that MyGov’s ATO portal now allows you to fill in your TFN and Super info online and send a report to the HR dweebs.
Ditto Medicare and your International Frankenvax Certificate, eh Gates?
How’s my Social Credit score?
I assume your suggestion is contingent on the aforementioned HR persons not being the same that design or provide the model the AI is to embody(?).
Technical staff often cut their own throats – they probably designed the above system for streamlining at the behest of HR.
However, in this case…
It’s all starting to read like a potboiler where Orwell got together with Ayn Rand updated by 70 years.
For a current interpretation of what may be coming in the second stage of this Great Reset very soon, Martin Armstrong has just added his 2 cents worth & it’s even more distressing than just the prospect of Pres Harris, AI, BRI & just the normal average everyday sort of economic catastrophe.
”The Inter-Governmental War
SUNDAY, 27 MARCH 2022 BY: MARTIN ARMSTRONG
QUESTION: You said that the Pentagon has been trying to prevent confrontation with Russia. I believe you mentioned that it was the Pentagon who said no to Poland handing jets to Zelensky. Yet reading between the lines, Biden seems to disagree with what you are suggesting. Not to criticize you, for I think you have far better contacts than anyone I read. Is Biden just senile? My nephew studied your Economic Confidence Model which was taught in the military institution, the Citadel.
ANSWER: No, there is actually an internal war going on in Washington. The State Department is in full control of the Neocons. They are pushing for World War III right now. Their personal hatred of both Russians and Chinese is what is driving this game. The Pentagon realizes the TRUE consequences of what is going on. This pretense being fed to the Media that Putin is on the ropes and the stories of chemical weapons are all coming from the White House and the State Department – NOT the Pentagon. The object here is to get the people behind a NATO invasion and Zelensky is doing whatever the Neocons instruct him.
It is as I have said before, the Pentagon who is trying to keep throwing cold water on this fire that the State Department is fanning. It is not that Biden is senile. That poses a separate risk for he could easily just order a full attack even though that is not legal under the Constitution without a declaration of war issued ONLY by Congress.
I am hoping that Putin can achieve his goal by the week of April 18th. That is the ONLY hope we have against the Neocons in the State Department who lead Biden around by his diapers. That will not eliminate WWIII. But it may buy us until 2023. These Neocons are totally insane and they are writing the script and Biden just reads the words. These Neocons are determined to destroy Russia and now Putin, along with China, have come to see the true nature of their adversary.
This time it is NOT the military. They know this is NOT an easy victory with a ticker-tape parade at the end. Yes, the Citadel came to me and asked permission to teach the ECM as the motivation and timing behind wars. That was a great honor. I hope it has infiltrated the military so that they do stand up to the State Department’s Neocons who have no problem spilling the blood of everyone else for their dreams of hate. ”
Needless to say, Martin has just issued an alert to all his subscribers to sell all emerging markets investments as he is fearing that on this current trajectory by the ..”first quarter of 2023 …[the] complete collapse of the global economy and [thus he is] strongly recommending the selling of any emerging market investments.
[I am wondering if maybe he would include Australia in that alert as almost all his models have capital about to exit or in the process of doing so from Australia…& his models are predicting a significant high /low here in a few weeks’ time.
It would be interesting to wargame how our various state & federal pollies & their bear-leaders aka our ‘public service’ bureaucrats would act in the event of such a scenario]
March 28, 2022 at 10:49 am
Shane – given your scenario above, is there any chance the Pentagon may (forcefully) take control away from the White House (Biden) & the State Dept?
”Fat Tony says:
March 28, 2022 at 1:03 pm
March 28, 2022 at 10:49 am
Shane – given your scenario above, is there any chance the Pentagon may (forcefully) take control away from the White House (Biden) & the State Dept? ”
Hmmm, maybe I just lack the big picture perspective, & I am trying to leave aside my innate Jacobite, almost Buchan-like proclivities, but I am just not seeing any hard evidence of a Trump revival [i.e of that King over the water].
But then if you are being hard-nosed about it, one shouldn’t.
To me it may be just like the Russian revolution where everyone said this was just so crazy & it has to fall apart really soon, so we can just sit back just like the kulaks did until it was their turn.
I am fully aware of all those pious hopes of a DJT restoration, & I am totally emotionally onboard with their aims, but just like those, unfortunate, Kafka-like, incarcerated Jan 6th protesters, who are record on video, are invited into the US Capitol, & now facing 20 yrs in jail, I have obligations to others & most importantly to myself not to be made a martyred fool of, especially where one’s financial survival is concerned.
Having made the above disclaimers, I do have to note Martin Armstrong in spite of his past experience of the inexorability of his software’s interpretation of the broad economic sweep of human psychology & behaviour, he is still out there fighting the good fight, trying to divert that tide of seeming predestination.
Unfortunately to me, it may end up being unavoidable just like the Foundation trilogy by Asimov.
So I am not optimistic, but I still keep praying & hoping
There has been a lot of talk recently of DJT as a new reborn Julius Caesar [or even better, General Patton ].
In both cases, neither ended well
Anyway, if anyone can turn it around, DJT can,
the only question in my mind is that if & when he hopefully makes that move to reclaim what he rightfully won, IMO, will there still be a USA left to be POTUS of, due to the stripping away of any delusion about the integrity of any election might end up being fatal to the very basis of the USA.
Years back in QLD[?]I think, I attended a conference where a Russian claiming to be the head of a state-funded institution of psychically gifted individuals situated in St Petersberg, who supposedly had advised Putin way back when, to never, ever react to or allow himself to be provoked by the USA, but rather be patient as the day would come where the USA would just suddenly disappear…a decade or so back that very notion would have been totally & easily dismissed
Really hope I am wrong…..
if you are in the mood, Fat Tony, & have the time for it, research ‘Clif High’ for an alternate, fascinating & really positive interpretation of our future yet to come.
Thanks for mentioning that Old Bloke – yes this is actually a spiritual battle below the surface and there is a divine time line that is playing out. The fascinating this is that one side has already completely 100% lost before the battle even began yet fight on they must.
Don’t be on the side that has lost!
Salty Cracker has quoted several GOP suggesting that Trump be made Leader of the House of Representatives – something that Trump hasn’t refuted, as yet.
Alabama Senate Candidate Says Trump Still Wants to “Rescind” 2020 Election and Hold a New One
March 29, 2022 at 5:40 pm
Salty Cracker has quoted several GOP suggesting that Trump be made Leader of the House of Representatives – something that Trump hasn’t refuted, as yet.”
I enjoy Salty Cracker a lot, he helps keep me & a lot of orthers sane….
[& I do get the narrative that Biden, Andrews, Soros, Klaus Schwab, Trudeau, Morrison, Gates, Fauci, Zelensky, Ahern, THE Spike protein & all of those accompanying undocumented, never seen before adjuncts plus all those Biolabs that Hunter & Obama were involved in setting up in eastern Europe, are all an attempt to try and wake up those determinedly blinkered normies who just want things to go back to normal [i.e thank god it’s friday]…I am just not seeing any waking up of those sleepers around me]
Plus, you are assuming that the DS hasn’t already worked out its own game plan to deal with the possibility of Trump as Speaker which couldn’t happen anyway until,at the very earliest, Jan 2023.
Do you really think the US will be able to hold it together till then? Personally, I have enough doubts about Australia & New Zealand, much less the USA, being able to do so.
To me, the most obvious DS countermoves would be Harris as POTUS with either HRC or Big Mike [aka Michele] as vice president.
Harris combined with Michelle, would be really hard to shift if Biden is off the scene.
The mere fact that we are even allowed to even talk about the Hunter Biden laptop or the Chinese & Russian buying of him & his dad or the Biden financial exploitation of various charity foundations implies that the DS is getting ready to flush Big Guy. To me, the real scandal is how in a matter of a few weeks he has managed to destroy the world economy & trade & maybe the US$ with his Russian sanctions thereby razing the foundations for the build-back better nonsense.
Russia have about the same GDP as Australia, but 5x the population.
Yet Russia spends around 20% of its GDP on military – and almost all of it on wages, and not actual arms. Putin needs boots on the ground through all the institutions to retain power.
The areas that fell to Russia over the last few ‘occupations’ have all suffered crippling economic collapse. This collapsed the vote base that was once around 50% Russian leaning.
Putin didn’t realize the above. He expected to take over areas un-opposed because they used to vote 80% on the pro-Russian line. Instead his troops move into to nothing but distain and quickly get into small arms fires and have to leave.
Now his stratedgy has massively backfired because he didn’t take any initiative early, and now his opponents are armed to the teeth, getting help from everywhere.