Everyone Must Do the Same Thing to Stay Safe

Post by David Bell 

A slogan seemingly developed by a febrile aardvark grazing on mushrooms keeps popping up in public health and politics as if it had meaning. Besides serving as proof that confused aardvarks can still outwit many humans, it also helps clarify whether someone talking about pandemics is profit-driven or out of their depth. There are a few variations on the wording, originally coined as:

No one is safe, until everyone is safe.

All essentially suggest that everyone must do the same thing, because otherwise the thing in question won’t work. This ‘thing’ is something profitable to someone (aardvarks are known investors), and this ‘someone’ ranges from pharmaceutical corporations and philanthro-capitalists to salaried public health professionals; they all benefit through diverting greater taxpayer funding to public health. The World Health Organization (WHO) has been its most prominent exponent, reflecting its new public-private business model. The WHO cohabits in Geneva with the World Economic Forum, a corporate club, aligning closely with the profitable fear-of-catastrophe approach to health. Understanding poverty may not be the WHO headquarters’ lived experience, but wealth concentration certainly is.

The phrase is highly successful. It is repeated on the websites of multiple major international health agencies (e.g. Gavi, CEPI, Unicef) and by an apparently mindless media. It is also clever; it places a virtuous tone over a program specifically designed to accumulate power and wealth. Its success is completely reliant on the hearer either not thinking, not caring, or feeling too disempowered to push back. That says much about our times, and the current state of international public health.

To clarify, let’s dissect the slogan a little in its original Covid vaccine context; No one is safe, until everyone is safe.

  1. “No one is safe until….”. This means the vaccine does not protect the vaccinated against the disease it is aimed at. If it did, then they would be safe. That is how vaccines are supposed to work. The WHO is claiming that Covid-19 vaccines don’t work to protect the injected.
  2. “…until everyone is safe.” Protecting one person by vaccinating another requires the vaccine to block transmission. But if there is one thing all sides accept about the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines, it is that the vaccinated can still transmit.

So, this slogan makes no sense in the Covid context, and if anything is an ‘anti-vax’ statement.

More recent variations promote the diversion of tens of billions of dollars to fund the growing international bureaucracy whom the WHO’s draft amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) and proposed pandemic treaty (agreement) are intended to support. The World Bank, also looking to gain from this pseudoscience debacle, terms this as “Risk anywhere becomes risk everywhere” – i.e., I should require others, whatever their needs or concerns, to prioritize my needs and remove my risk.

After a century in which improved living conditions, sanitation, nutrition, and antibiotics have drastically reduced infectious disease, the public is to believe that they can no longer be safe until all are surveilled, locked down like criminals. They can then be subjected to mandated ‘100-day vaccines’ that, by skipping normal regulation and testing, will allow them to get some of their heavily-supervised freedom back. This promises enormous profit for the very corporations and investors that are promoting it.

Beyond the aspect of people and institutions robbing the poor in the name of virtue, there is a still darker side to this story. ‘We are not safe, because others did not obey or comply’ is the same message, and the same intent. The parade of politicians, influencers, and media commentators during Covid advocating for the exclusion and scapegoating of those prioritizing human rights over corporate greed has not been edifying. ‘My illness is your fault’ is a catchcry of fascists and their brownshirts throughout human history.

Considering the public stupid and treating them as such, when the same public funds your wages, is reckless, rude, and disrespectful. Promoting idiocy and division in the name of public health destroys trust. It probably wasn’t really a demented aardvark who came up with the slogan, but a young amoral McKinsey-like behavioral psychologist. Behavioral psychology, a form of advertising, is about getting people to act in a certain way, irrespective of their rational judgment. The use of this in healthcare reflects a rot that seems to have grown through society.

Truth does not matter, and previous learning does not matter, but ensuring people act in a desired way, usually on the bidding of a paymaster, does. The media, heavily dependent on the same sponsors as public health, is more motivated to promote such messaging than analyze it and reveal its flaws.

Eventually, the public gets wise, and blatant falsehoods destroy the reputations of those promoting them. As the ‘consensus of experts’ in public health is seen increasingly as a pretense driven by self-interest, we see them doubling down with rhetoric about ‘rebuilding trust’ through increasing censorship. Flailing around with terms like ‘misinformation,’ they now claim that being informed is a threat rather than a necessity; the WHO’s ‘infodemic.’

So, most people will come to understand that models suggesting 20 million people were saved by Covid vaccines are a result of flawed inputs and assumptions rather than reality, that closing workplaces and schools in crowded cities won’t decrease respiratory virus but will inevitably increase poverty and malnutrition, and that claiming ‘No one is safe until everyone is safe’ is the stuff of clowns and charlatans. These claims are made by people who don’t care about truth. They are banking on success being achieved through psychology and coercion rather than integrity.

As more people awaken to the farce, calls for censorship and coercion, and attempts at outright fear-mongering such as the Disease-X narrative will become more desperate. The sloganeering will become ever more unhinged from reality until it collapses under the weight of its own fallacies. The public will become tired of being deceived and remember things were actually getting better before this deceit started. Alternatively, some dangerous clown in a lab will concoct another pathogenic agent to make it all more real.

In either scenario, we cannot afford to have those who lead through empty sloganeering in control. We should treat them with all the respect they deserve. We will only be truly safe when we insist on integrity as a prerequisite for public office, and a basis for public health. That is as near or far as we choose it to be.


This article has been republished from the Brownstone Institute.

This entry was posted in Covid, Health, Media, The Great Reset. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Everyone Must Do the Same Thing to Stay Safe

  1. kaysee kaysee says:

    So, most people will come to understand that models suggesting 20 million people were saved by Covid vaccines are a result of flawed inputs and assumptions rather than reality …

    Were the Covid vaxxes safe and effective?

    Feb 2024
    Global Covid-19 Summit: Dr. Fareed and Dr. Tyson

    Dr. Fareed and Dr. Tyson, from the Imperial Valley healthcare district, will be discussing 12 declarations from the Global COVID Summit of 17,000 physicians as of recent Congressional Hearings and the Japan press conference attesting to the dangers and lack of efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines.

    “After three years of scientific research, millions of patients treated, hundreds of clinical trials performed and scientific data shared, we have demonstrated and documented our success in understanding and combating the COVID-19 orchestrated crisis. In considering the risks versus benefits of major policy decisions, our coalition of 17,000 physicians and medical scientists from all over the world have reached the following, updated consensus”


    Report comment
  2. kaysee kaysee says:

    1/
    Covid-19 Royal Commission

    I posted the Terms of Reference last month and some of you may have signed it.
    Here is one of the co-creators of that document at the Public Hearing, last week.

    Lawyer Julian Gillespie.
    Covid19 Royal Commission Public Hearing 1/2/2024.

    Has trust been lost in Australian institutions, is it recoverable?

    “The values handed down to Australians by their grandparents made the social contract in this country – that contract was torn up and burned by government during the era of Covid.

    Trust. There is a lot of trust to be earned back here, and it ‘s only going to occur once we get a royal commission having the bad actors admit they did wrong”


    Report comment
  3. kaysee kaysee says:

    2/
    Malcolm Roberts
    Anthony Albanese must call a fully empowered Royal Commission, like he promised.
    .

    If you want to watch the inquiry
    COVID Royal Commission Terms of Reference Inquiry


    Report comment
  4. John Bayley says:

    “Staying Apart Keeps Us Together!”
    Comrades.
    Love,
    Chairman Dan
    (who was subsequently re-elected by the Victorian public.)
    What more needs to be said?


    Report comment
  5. kaysee kaysee says:

    Chairman Dan
    (who was subsequently re-elected by the Victorian public.)

    We have a hard task ahead, but those who are awake need to keep resisting. We need to use our voices wherever we can so those who are not yet awake, may hear us, wake up and vote for freedom fighters not dictators, next time.

    I come across many brave campaigners, especially on social media, and they inspire me to keep doing my part here on this blog.

    Dr David Cartland
    He’s begging, imploring his colleagues to do the right thing.
    .

    Ros Nealon-Cook
    …remaining silent was no longer an option.


    Report comment
  6. kaysee kaysee says:

    Jan. 31, 2024
    Treatments, Corruption and Disease X
    With Tanya Gaw & Dr. Peter McCullough

    Dr. Peter McCullough, internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, once again joins Tanya Gaw on the Empower Hour to discuss treatments, corruption, sudden deaths and the ominous Disease X.


    Report comment
  7. kaysee kaysee says:

    More recent variations promote the diversion of tens of billions of dollars to fund the growing international bureaucracy whom the WHO’s draft amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) and proposed pandemic treaty (agreement) are intended to support.

    If this updated treaty is agreed in May, this year, your health and the health of everyone will be controlled by the WHO.

    Exit the WHO

    Currently the WHO is negotiating two binding documents, the Pandemic Agreement also known as Accord, Treaty and Ca ++ and the amendments to International Health Regulations IHR. These two documents will be voted on in Geneva in May of 2024 by the World Health Assembly.

    ….

    WHO Proposed Amendments

    Page-1
    .

    Page-2


    Report comment
  8. kaysee kaysee says:

    The Covid tyranny
    seen in Australia & around the world was unforgivable. There must be accountability.

    “I have no compassion for those that turned against their fellow human beings & treated them like crap during the Covid pandemic. Or who discriminated against them wilfully. Or who treated them in ways that you could only describe as better belonging to last century.” ellymelly

    “We didn’t go through WW2 and all the way through the Nuremberg Trials, to throw out every single principle that we supposedly learned about bodily autonomy and government power.” MoiraDeemingMP


    Report comment
  9. kaysee kaysee says:

    The Covid Era: How they treated the ones who resisted.

    Anti-Vaxx-1
    .

    Anti-Vaxx-2
    .

    Anti-Vaxx-3


    Report comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *