Digital ID Commences Next Month in Australia

It is a co-ordinated strategy. It may appear to be the policy of your current elected government, but has been planned for years by entities that you did not vote for. It was set in motion with the global scamdemic where the population was controlled through a fear campaign and the mandating of masks, lockdowns and jabs.

Covid was the testing ground for implementing the safe and effective slogan, the we’re all in it together mantra and the it’s for your security and well-being refrain. We were promised it was all voluntary not mandatory.

Until it wasn’t.

Using Covid as the launching pad for the rest of the agenda, WEF, the agency we did not elect, told us How digital identity can improve lives in a post-COVID-19 world while McKinsey explained The value of digital ID for the global economy and society. The Gates Foundation assured us that Digital IDs are an effective tool against poverty.

The supposedly great concern by all these global agencies for our well-being has led to the introduction of the Digital Identity (DI) in parts of the world as well as, simultaneously, this year-end in the UK, Canada and Australia.

United Kingdom

The government has announced plans to Rollout Mandatory Digital ID ‘As a Matter of Urgency’. It is for citizens who ‘wish to participate in society.’

Prime Minister Starmer, who met with Bill Gates recently to discuss the scheme, launched the Office for Digital Identities and Attribute (OfDIA) – a digital ID watchdog within the Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology, tasked with rolling out the mandatory digital ID’s under the leadership of chief executive Hannah Rutter.

There is now an Office for Digital Identities and a certification for DI.

Canada

In Canada, it is the path of secretly mandated digital ID and a ‘digital credentials’ system for Canadians.

This is despite the cyberattacks on taxpayer accounts.

Australia

Here in Australia, the Digital ID Act 2024 legislation passed the Senate (March 2024) and House of Reps (May 2024). It commences on 1 December 2024 – just three weeks away. This information on the Act according to the government website.

What is this Digital ID Act?

The Digital ID Act 2024 and the Digital ID (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Act 2024 will commence by 1 December 2024.

Legislation will enable the Commonwealth to partner with states, territories and the private sector to create a better Digital ID experience for all Australians.

Who is this legislation for?

This legislation provides assurance to consumers that their privacy and security is protected when they use the services of an accredited provider.

It is also relevant for businesses and state and territory governments who wish to:
be accredited for the digital ID services they provide, or
– rely on a digital ID to verify the ID of their customers.

What are the benefits of the legislation?

The Accreditation Scheme and the Australian Government Digital ID System will deliver a range of benefits to consumers and business users, service providers, government, and the broader economy.

For Australians, this means a safe, secure, convenient and reusable way to verify who they are online, and having access to more services and businesses from the comfort of their home at a time that suits them.

This legislation will ensure that providers of Digital IDs will be governed by legislation and designed with privacy in mind so Australians can trust their information is safe and secure.

For business, the legislation means a simpler way to verify their customers. They get access to a market of accredited Digital ID providers, giving them and their customers peace of mind.

For entities offering Digital ID services, the legislation will provide a nationally consistent set of standards they can be accredited against and give them greater access to government agencies and businesses requiring ID services.

For government, the legislation will improve security and streamline processes across agencies. This will make it easier for Australians to access more government services and decrease the risk of identity fraud.

For the broader economy, a whole-of-economy Digital ID is a significant economic and security opportunity.

The Digital ID is being marketed as something that is going to make your life safer and easier. Like the vaxx, we are being told that it is safe and voluntary. But we know how well that works. We’ve seen it before.

Can we do anything about it?

It is up to each individual. Do they trust the government that something is safe and good for them and voluntarily sign up?

Or did they learn from the lessons of Covid and now know better than to confidently accept that what they are being told is the truth? That they need to ask questions, to be wary, to understand the consequences of this legislation? To realise that convenience is not necessarily a good feature of the unknown?

The agenda has been promoted and pushed along by tyrants like Bill Gates (see here, here and here) and Tony Blair (here and here). The Digital ID is already in use in China. There is an electronic ID system in Kuwait, too.

In addition to this Digital ID, the government is also trying to rush through its Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation Bill 2024.

We the People

We need to research and check the details of this law to learn our rights so that we do not get deceived through ignorance. I have not had the time to study the law in detail, so it is a learning process for us all. One noteworthy and vital point for us all to remember is this:
if we, the citizens of the country, the mere plebs, unite and work together against the forces that try to control us, we can win against them. Yes, we can. But for that to happen and succeed, we need to become Aware, Awake and Active.

______________________________________

______________________________________________________

 


 

This entry was posted in Freedom, Government, The Great Reset. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Digital ID Commences Next Month in Australia

  1. kaysee kaysee says:

    Canada
    Leslyn Lewis
    (Member of Parliament)
    She explains how the Digital ID works and its dangers.
    How governments can easily abuse it.
    .

    US
    Kat Lindley
    The potential for abuse through surveillance


    Report comment
  2. Esme says:

    This is really good, kaysee – so much in it! I’ll have to come back to it later. The memes/quotes are great too.


    Report comment
  3. kaysee kaysee says:

    The WEF-fing plan

    WEF-1
    A scam to seize control
    .

    WEF-2
    Digital control
    .

    WEF-3
    Digital Surveillance via Digital ID


    Report comment
  4. kaysee kaysee says:

    Nicola
    Digital ID experience
    .

    Section 74
    Yes, but…
    .

    verica
    … Initially voluntary, but later????


    Report comment
  5. kaysee kaysee says:

    David Icke

    A Message To The Awakening

    Mass non-compliance is the ONLY way to end the tyranny we’re currently living under.

    Calvin Coolidge
    .

    The Great Resist


    Report comment
  6. Esme says:

    Minimum age for social media access “to protect” Australian kids

    The Albanese Government will legislate 16 as the minimum age for access to social media, following endorsement by National Cabinet today.

    The decision follows extensive consultation with young people, parents and carers, academics and child development experts, community, industry and civil organisations, First Nations youth, and state and territory governments.

    The Albanese Government will introduce legislation in the next Parliamentary sitting fortnight.

    The Bill puts the onus on social media platforms, not parents or young people, to take reasonable steps to ensure fundamental protections are in place.


    Report comment
  7. Esme says:

    Digital ID incoming: you’ve been played

    While everyone is outraged with the MAD Bill, liberal and labor to push through social media bans for the kiddies.

    Digital ID incoming.

    You’ve been played.

    Australia’s plan to ban children from social media proves popular, problematic

    The leaders of all eight Australian states and mainland territories have unanimously backed the plan, although Tasmania, the smallest state, would have preferred the threshold was set at 14.

    But a vocal assortment of experts in the fields of technology and child welfare have responded with alarm. More than 140 such experts signed an open letter to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese condemning the 16-year age limit as “too blunt an instrument to address risks effectively.”

    Details of what is proposed and how it will be implemented are scant. More will be known when legislation is introduced into the Parliament next week.

    The skeptical internet expert

    Tama Leaver, professor of internet studies at Curtin University, fears that the government will make the platforms hold the users’ identification data instead.

    The government has already said the onus will be on the platforms, rather than on children or their parents, to ensure everyone meets the age limit.

    “The worst possible outcome seems to be the one that the government may be inadvertently pushing towards, which would be that the social media platforms themselves would end up being the identity arbiter,” Leaver said.

    “They would be the holder of identity documents which would be absolutely terrible because they have a fairly poor track record so far of holding on to personal data well,” he added.


    Report comment
  8. Esme says:

    When you find yourself agreeing with much of the socialist view

    While legislation has yet to be introduced to parliament, Albanese has indicated that the government will seek to pass a law mandating the ban in the next weeks and the opposition Liberal-National Coalition have stated they will vote in favor. Once again, the major parties are joining hands to rush through legislation without any popular mandate, in this case to dramatically expand their censorship of the internet.

    The significance of the policy is underscored by the fact that it is the first such ban targeting an entire cohort in a purportedly democratic country.

    Albanese and his ministers have not provided any coherent rationale for the ban or its supposed urgency. Their most consistent line has been that social media harms the mental health of young people. They have pointed to backward and offensive content on the internet, which is hardly a new phenomenon, as well as safety risks…

    The social media ban, however, is also an attack on the general population. Labor has refused to outline any concrete mechanism for its implementation. However, to exclude children under-16, enforcing an age verification program for the entire population would almost certainly be necessary. That would involve people giving their identification and other sensitive personal information to the state and/or the social media conglomerates.

    For years, Labor, the Coalition and the ruling elite have railed against relative anonymity online. If people are going to criticise the government, they have more or less openly stated, they should be compelled to put their name to it, including for potential legal action under Australia’s far-reaching and anti-democratic defamation laws. That is the line that has been used by every dictatorial and despotic regime in history, aimed at intimidating and silencing dissent.


    Report comment
  9. Esme says:

    See the “blunt instrument”, no-popular-mandate under-16 ban was at least raised on Sky tonight


    Report comment

Comments are closed.