Welcome, one and all, to the new financial year! To rising electricity prices and food prices and everything prices! Inflation eating away at your retirement savings! All due to the pollimuppets, together with the pubic serpents, of the Uniparty. Oh, and for good measure, let’s have a serious division (da ‘Voice’) in our society.
• Died with based on tests that are not diagnostic.
• Underlying cause of death is not cause of death
• No it didn’t
• Most Convid deaths were actually heart failure
• People otherwise in the best of health
Further down
187 deaths that were due to long term effects of COVID-19 (e.g. post COVID-19 condition, long COVID-19)
Only 187 vaccine deaths? What about the 20,000 excess deaths?
And nowhere is the vax status recorded. Just criminal.
FFSAKE…………………. Just saw a new ad on the tele for the NAB bank……… The bank man behind the desk was an Asian. The business guy was Indian and the customers looked Arab or a whole mix of the lot…………….
Outgoing CHO Brett Sutton has been named Victorian of the Year, revealing not only that he wanted to decline the award – but that he is “profoundly sorry” for some of his decisions.
Elon Musk takes two steps forward and then two steps back. He needs to work out his goal for Twitter and how he plans to run it. He talks about Free Speech and willing to lose money over it, but then makes decisions that contradict what he says.
He has made some poor recruitment choices, especially the CEO. It would have been easy to get some good executives for his top positions, at lower remuneration packages, since there will be many conservative techies who would change jobs to work for a Free Speech tech company.
Now, it seems, he is blocking unregistered users in the hope that they will sign up and join Twitter. He says the reason is because:
Several hundred organizations (maybe more) were scraping Twitter data extremely aggressively, to the point where it was affecting the real user experience.
What should we do to stop that? I’m open to ideas.
If he does not unblock this quickly, it will backfire as many will just walk away from the platform. And those who are account holders and posters will lose their readers and thus their viewing numbers.
The Uluru statement is militant. It offers no sentence of respect or gratitude to the Australian people. Yet it is hailed by the PM as warm hearted and generous.
3/
From an article yesterday, we hear that the Yes 23 activist group is planning to enlist 50,000 volunteers for its campaign. They will be pushing the message of how the Voice will help indigenous health and education. And the group wants to steer clear of any questions related to the mechanics of the Voice.
So, as always, the left use the emotion over reason, the feelz over think. Make it an emotional issue and use blackmail.
The list of questions keeps getting longer. Let’s get some queries on the billions of dollars already given to various indigenous groups, precisely for health and education. Where has the money gone? If it hasn’t helped the indigenous so far, how can we be sure it will help them when they have the Voice?
I’ve heard the figure of 30+ billion dollars each year that is given out for indigenous causes. Is there a verification source for the amount? I have been unable to find a link.
Did the New World Order/Great Reset agenda begin 50-60 years ago?
Or was it much earlier?
Who are the real power brokers in this world? Were the “symbols” described in the video connected to some people, places and events? Planned or some coincidences? Or misinterpretations? What is the truth? What is conspiracy?
This video was posted in 2021. A description states:
The person speaking in it is Altiyan Childs, who was an X-factor winner and joined the free masons to propel his career and remain relevant on the world stage. I do not know where he is today and this video is just to inform those still asleep as to this satanic cult of secret societies.
From Wikipedia.
On 15 April 2021, Altiyan released a five-hour youtube video on Freemasonry, and its secretly antagonistic relationship with Christianity. Altiyan claims to be a former member of the Masonic fraternity, breaking his Masonic oaths in order to produce his 5 hour presentation. The conclusion of the presentation is that international Freemasonry is in fact Organised Satanism in disguise.
If he does not unblock this quickly, it will backfire as many will just walk away from the platform. And those who are account holders and posters will lose their readers and thus their viewing numbers.
I don’t have a Twitter account but always post and link to tweets on the Cat.
Altiyan claims to be a former member of the Masonic fraternity, breaking his Masonic oaths in order to produce his 5 hour presentation. The conclusion of the presentation is that international Freemasonry is in fact Organised Satanism in disguise.
The heyday of Freemasonry is well and truly in the past. It is not clear if this Altiyan chap is referring to Masons since the beginning or recently, and I’m not listening to five hours of his presentation to find out.
I will say that it is very, very unlikely that old time Masons had anything to do with Satanism. I knew quite a few of them in my younger days, and it’s laughable.
Masonry was big in the north of England, and members were typically devout Chapel types. Satanism? Nup.
If there are some creepy elements in the meagre remnants of the Freemasons these days – meh.
Australian Story A Voice From The Heart – Megan Davis
2:30PM – 3:00PM
Megan Davis fell in love with the Constitution. She’s a lawyer and a driving force behind the Voice referendum who wants to change the nation’s founding document.
Janet Albrechtsen
Worried about the voice? Wait until you see the treaty
A Yes vote in the referendum is not the end of the process but rather the starting gun to a long and divisive treaty
From behind the paywall – Janet Albrechtsen quotes the words of the radical activists which have been reported elsewhere but summarises the agenda thus:
What few voters understand is that while the voice provides the necessary negotiating platform and leverage for activists to achieve the desired treaty, the new constitutionally enshrined race-based body is only secondary to the treaty. That is because the voice does not in itself give ATSI people the two things activists really want: namely, sovereignty and a form of self-government, and reparations. Only a treaty can do that. That’s why voters should realise that a Yes vote will likely guarantee many more years of agitation and division until, and perhaps even after, a treaty is achieved.
The Uluru Statement from the Heart is a vulnerable document. It is sometimes silent when Aboriginal failures are visible, but vocal in condemning Australian people for misdeeds that never happened.
Without doubt, the Indigenous people have had many legitimate grievances about their sufferings and slights ever since British convicts and marines arrived in 1788. Hosts of Aboriginal people were killed in frontier conflict, though the historians’ statistics of death tend to contradict each other. Most Indigenous people died from diseases to which they had no immunity, and such deaths far exceed those suffered in warfare since 1788.
Countless Aboriginal people died from the excessive consumption of alcohol: rum and brandy rather than beer and wine were their temptation. Moreover, most Aboriginal people preferred novel foods such as sugar, flour and mutton rather than the plants they had skillfully gathered during an ingenious way of life that also kept them fit. The sight of so many overweight Aboriginal people today would confound their lean ancestors, if by chance still alive.
The loss of their lands, their “dispossession”, of course created resentment. But Aboriginal leaders tend to think they were the world’s only such sufferers. In fact, the ancestors of most mainstream Australians painfully lost their lands in some faraway era and received no compensation.
Thus in 1066 the Norman Conquest of England and the actual killing or enslavement of so many people, and the raping or castration of others, was probably as devastating as the British conquest of Australia. In contrast, no Aboriginal people were turned into slaves. English people who suffered severely from the consequences of the Norman invasion in 1066 must have outnumbered the Aboriginal people who suffered severely from the conquest of Australia in, say, the 70 years after 1788.
Likewise, ancient Aboriginal people themselves were champions at dispossessing their neighbours, and one day that fact should be taught in Australian schools. In every known part of the world the semi-nomadic hunters and gatherers had been deadly in their tribal warfare.
Inside the Uluru statement, two major accusations are expressed in one pithy sentence: “In 1967 we were counted, in 2017 we seek to be heard.” The Aboriginal leaders who met at Uluru believed their kinsfolk were not even deemed worthy of being counted – until the referendum of 1967 raised their political status. Anthony Albanese himself, while understandably basking in his political honeymoon, affirmed this accusation, and continues to do so in parliament. If true, the accusation is a serious blemish on the Australian nation during the past century and a half. But it is not true.
In his many overseas trips Albanese has performed calmly and courteously. But at home, on the question that is now his very first priority, he seems sometimes to be at sea. It is fair to say he went overboard when in the Marrickville town hall on October 14 last year he told a packed gathering that Australia since 1788 had a “brutal” history, full stop. We all make unwise or sweeping statements from time to time.
Albanese’s favourite message is that Australia is “the world’s oldest living culture”. But New Guinea was occupied by human beings at about the same time as – or earlier than – Australia, and accordingly it also might be the world’s oldest living culture. Aboriginal people on the whole now have the higher quality of life, but wide is the gap between most city and big-town residents and that minority struggling in the outback communities. Closing the Gap has several meanings.
We learned how determined Albanese was when he affirmed, alongside the Uluru statement, that Aboriginal people were crippled by “powerlessness”. Now he is scaling the Mount Everest of Australian politics by seeking a drastic change to Australia’s Constitution. Thereby he will empower Indigenous people and simultaneously reduce the power of the great majority of Australians. But what if the Uluru statement, with its errors and omissions, does not justify an upheaval in Australia’s democratic system?
The Uluru statement is militant. It offers no sentence of respect or gratitude to the Australian people. Yet it is hailed by Albanese as warm hearted and generous. He even announced in a memorial lecture in Adelaide recently that it was an invitation extended “to every single Australian in love and grace and patience”.
A disciple of Bruce Pascoe, Albanese admires his nonsensical Dark Emu theory. Pascoe believes Aboriginal Australia was the first real democracy in the world and for 80,000 years a haven of peace and prosperity. Albanese believes this utopia – in fact, it never existed – can in some ways be honoured if Indigenous people are compensated with special powers and rights.
Parliament in its recent debate did nothing to validate the Uluru accusation that mainstream Australians had refused for generations even to count Aboriginal people. In fact, these proud people were being counted before any one of us was born.
We can appreciate the sense of hurt in young, politically active Aboriginal people when they hear the myth that they, their parents and grandparents had not been deemed worthy of being counted in a census. More insulting, the young are led to believe that the sheep had been counted regularly – as undoubtedly they were – but not the Aboriginal people.
In parliament last month Tanya Plibersek mistakenly announced, in an otherwise informative address, that in 1901 the “Aboriginal people weren’t counted in the census or commonly allowed to vote”. Her ministerial colleague Catherine King told parliament that Aboriginal people – in the words of one informant – were powerless “simply because we were never identified as humans”. That can’t be true.
Day by day, all shoppers at Coles supermarkets receive on their printed receipts a highly selective message based on Uluru. The directors of Coles Group do not seem to realise that, through the years, their own executives – in recommending places where the next dozen stores might or might not be opened – must have known where most Aboriginal people lived.
Linda Burney, born in a small Riverina township, is deservedly praised for making her way from a humble Aboriginal home to become a cabinet minister in Sydney and now in Canberra. But she has mistakenly insisted that as a young girl she was never in a census. “The notion that you weren’t worthy of being counted was very painful,” she exclaimed in July 2017. She once misinformed parliament that until the age of 10 she was not even a citizen. Instead, she claimed she was merely ranked under “the flora and fauna act” of NSW. Such a policy did not exist.
The first census to be conducted by commonwealth officers was in 1911, and the federal attorney-general instructed them to count “full-blood Aboriginals”. Understandably, the officers had to retreat when they reached remote areas where local inhabitants had seen no white person or heard a word of English. But tens of thousands of Aboriginal people were actually counted, often with enormous effort, in the accessible regions.
For a logical but slightly complicated reason, they were not – after the actual counting – included in the final tally of population. For instance, in apportioning a share of the federal customs revenue to each state, the smallish Aboriginal populations were not “reckoned” when finalising the payments to each state. Helen Irving’s book To Constitute a Nation neatly explains the reasons and the practice.
Today, visitors to the National Museum in Canberra are informed that not until 1971 were “Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples counted in the Australian census”. On the contrary, they had been counted in every federal census since 1901, and counted moreover in the face of obstacles confronted by few other national statisticians. Thus the state officials then in charge of that 1901 census specifically counted them. They set up a special category that comprised “full blood Aboriginals” and those “nomadic half castes” who were living with them. In the five mainland states they totalled 41,389. An even larger number could not be counted, being nomadic and too far distant.
There were precise censuses even before 1901, thus contradicting Albanese and the Uluru leaders. For example, South Australia, holding a census on Sunday, April 2, 1871, recorded the exact districts and towns where more than 5000 Aboriginal men and women lived.
Eye-opening was the census held on the same Sunday in gold-rich Victoria, where 731,528 people of all races were counted. Conducted by Henry Hayter, the census commanded respect from leading overseas statisticians. The main results were in the hands of parliamentarians barely two months later – a feat that is unimaginable in the age of fast computers.
Of those Victorian officials who took part in the detailed census, 918 went on horseback and 650 on foot. They investigated remote townships, huts and tents where only one or two Aboriginal people could be found. That the tally of these people had fallen since Victoria’s previous census in 1861 was evident, and it would continue to fall.
Labor MP Graham Perrett says he is “quite optimistic” about the Voice to Parliament going up in Queensland. “I… know we’ve got a lot of work to do, but knocking on doors, having conversations in the street is something that all campaigns are about; you can move people
Four out of every 10 of the Victorian Aboriginal men said they were following a paid occupation; and that was a higher proportion than can be found in many remote Aboriginal settlements today. In Victoria, two of every five Aboriginal children of school age could read but fewer could write. Five Aboriginal adults were recorded as blind, and seven were over the age of 70, according to the census teams.
Hayter was meticulous. In the big printed edition of the census report he added a minor correction to the tally of 61,000 “Chinese and Aborigines” who had been separately counted: please “take 1 from the males and add 1 to the females”. Generally, the Aboriginal populations had considerably more males than females.
Across the globe most people alive in 1871 had not yet been counted officially. It is therefore remarkable that Aboriginal people in various towns and regions of Australia were systematically counted.
Other of our censuses were held before 1871, the year Albanese’s own ancestral land of Italy held its first nationwide census. One generation later, in 1897, the initial census in Russia’s vast empire at last enumerated famous individuals such as Finnish composer Jean Sibelius and Russian writers Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky.
Unfortunately, the allegation – “a people not worth counting” – is now endorsed by some of the biggest business houses, by the football leagues and even by universities that are world-ranked for their research.
The leaders at Uluru insisted that their people had been powerless for generations This lament is also far-fetched.
In stressing the “torment of our powerlessness”, they did not know that in the late 1850s, in the three populous Australian colonies, most Aboriginal men were allowed to vote. This was a momentous event: most of Europe’s tens of millions of men had not yet won the right to vote. Indeed, a forgotten man of Aboriginal and convict ancestry won the rural seat of Young in NSW in 1889.
The crowd on the south side of Grenfell Street, Adelaide, watching the posting of the South Australian colonial election results outside The Register newspapers office in April 1896.
The crowd on the south side of Grenfell Street, Adelaide, watching the posting of the South Australian colonial election results outside The Register newspapers office in April 1896.
Another landmark – unknown to Uluru – was a general election held in 1896 in South Australia. This was probably the first government in the world to allow women not only to vote but also to stand for parliament. New Zealand women already had the first right but not the second.
In this same 1896 election in South Australia, even more revolutionary was the sight of Aboriginal women attending the polling booth. Martin Luther King might well have shaken his head in surprise if he had known of it.
Just pause and ponder for one minute: South Australia’s innovation occurred when 99 per cent of the women in the world did not have a vote. In renowned cities such as Paris, Berlin, London, New York, St Petersburg, Tokyo and Beijing, not one woman had the privilege now exercised by female Aboriginal voters in South Australia. Five years later in the first federal election various Aboriginal women must have voted – an election in which no white woman in the four eastern states was entitled to vote. These triumphs contradict the Uluru manifesto.
Indigenous people hope to gain a major say in shaping a beneficial treaty with the Australian nation; they demand a truth-telling tribunal dominated by the Indigenous; and they call for the right at times to influence vital spheres such as foreign policy. They will also break the golden rule of democracy: one person, one vote.
Meanwhile, their cry of “powerlessness” is a kind of crocodile tear. In the past half-century Aboriginal groups have been handsomely recognised by their acquisition – under the Fraser and Keating governments – of ownership or certain rights and interests in 55 per cent of the Australian land mass. Few Australian voters know this fact. It constitutes one of the largest peaceful transfers of land in the history of the modern world.
Historian Geoffrey Blainey is the author of more than 40 books. His recent memoir is called Before I Forget (Penguin).
I will say that it is very, very unlikely that old time Masons had anything to do with Satanism. I knew quite a few of them in my younger days, and it’s laughable.
Most Masons just think that it’s a harmless charitable boy’s club with some dressing up in silly aprons etc., it’s not until they get to the 33rd degree that they are told that they worship Lucifer.
The majority of the members never know about the core beliefs of that organisation, they just join to advance their prospects in life.
Troy Bramston in The Australian arguing that Donald Trump Jr. should not be admitted to Australia
Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil can use her authority under the Migration Act 1958 and Migration Regulations 1994 to “refuse to grant a person a visa if the person does not pass the character test”. The legislation defines the character test at subsection 501(6) of the act.
It stipulates that if the person has an association with or is a member of an organisation that has been involved in criminal conduct, or the reasonable suspicion of such conduct, they can be denied a visa to Australia. Trump Jr clearly meets this requirement. Last December The Trump Organisation was found guilty of 17 counts of tax fraud, which included falsifying business records and conspiracy.
I look forward to Joe and Hunter Biden being refused as convicted felons
That’s why voters should realise that a Yes vote will likely guarantee many more years of agitation and division until, and perhaps even after, a treaty is achieved.
Will the public learn from the trickery of the past?
2017: Same Sex Marriage. Love is Love.
2017 – 2023: It wasn’t about love or marriage.
The No side in 2017 knew where the slippery slope was headed. But even they would not have guessed how bad it would be.
2023: Voice referendum
The No side knows it isn’t about equality. It is about another agenda.
That is because the voice does not in itself give ATSI people the two things activists really want: namely, sovereignty and a form of self-government, and reparations. Only a treaty can do that.
I don’t have Twitter or Instagram accounts. But I was able to open a link to this Instagram post and can also share it here. In the past two days, Twitter seems to be in a mess even for those with accounts.
Sarah Huckabee Sanders
I will not erase the beautiful cross my kids drew in chalk on the driveway of the Governor’s Mansion or remove my post on social media, and I will not now or ever hide that I am a Christian.
Woolfe, thanks for posting that excellent opinion piece from Geoffrey Blainey. It is a pity that it is a paywalled article. If it had a link, it could be shared widely. There must be some way to do it.
Historical facts and statistics against the falsehoods spread by the activist brigade.
Most Masons just think that it’s a harmless charitable boy’s club with some dressing up in silly aprons etc., it’s not until they get to the 33rd degree that they are told that they worship Lucifer.
The point you make about Masons thinking it is a harmless club and thinking it would help their prospects would explain why many get into it. The plan would be to reel them in gently and, once in the trap, it would be hard to get out.
There are several commenters who agree with what Altiyan has said in his video. They have had personal experience directly or through family members who have been masons. Some have vouched for it due to their own study and research into this cult.
Two comments:
1/ My grandfather was a 33rd degree Mason and a Master Shriner. You would have never known that he was caught up in this. My grandmother was the leader of her chapter of the Eastern stars. When my father was born again and baptized in the name of Jesus at the age of 30, my grandparents were totally against it and almost disowned him. They fought against it and hated it.
2/ I studied freemasonry and the occult out of curiosity for well over a decade, I have (Edit: Had) most of the books he referenced in this video. Everything he’s saying is true, he nailed all of the symbolism.
To be deprived of a bank account is to be the victim of social murder.
Neil Oliver reacts to Nigel Farage having his bank account closed ‘without explanation’.
Climbers urged to stay off Glass House Mountains ‘out of respect’
The state government is urging people not to climb an iconic South East Queensland mountain during NAIDOC Week as a sign of respect for Indigenous people.
These are the ones so far from the blog Cats. If you have other questions that can be added, please post them. The list will be updated and revised.
1/ Just who is indigenous?
2/ Is Bruce Pascoe indigenous?
3/ What standards will be applied to acknowledge indigenousness?
(Notes: It used to be a threefold test: the ‘three-part’ definition of Aboriginal identity
“An Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander is a person *of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent
*who identifies as an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander and
*is accepted as such by the community in which he (she) lives.”)
4/ What will be the direct cost to taxpayers of not just the peak body, but all the processes associated with appointing it and maintaining it?
5/ What will be the indirect costs resulting from delayed decisions, foregone wealth from cancelled projects, and legal challenges from both sides?
6/ What are the quantifiable benefits to offset the above costs?
7/ If you don’t know the answers to the above (Qs 4, 5, 6) how can you responsibly ask people to vote for it?
8/ As our indigenous brothers and sisters have the same voting rights as I do, why should some people have extra privileges in shaping and influencing legislation than I do? i.e., they already have the same “voice” as I have. They can complain to their elected representative in the same manner as I can, and they would be equally ignored like me too. Equality.
9/ If the referendum passes, how will the members of the Voice Advisory panel be selected? Will there be a voting process based on some rules?
10/ The non-indigenous Australians are expected to respect and acknowledge the indigenous people as the first inhabitants of this country. Is the same not due by indigenous people to the rest of the Australians for what they contribute to help the indigenous people?
11/ Each year, over 30 billion dollars is given by the government to help indigenous people? That is a huge amount of money. Taxpayers need to know what has happened to their tax dollars.
12/ In 2023, middle Australia is struggling with the cost of living: paying grocery bills, rent or mortgage, medical bills, power bills. There are Australians – both indigenous and non-indigenous – who are homeless, ill, unable to work, can’t afford to pay their bills – yet the government considers the indigenous Voice to Parliament as a far more important issue worth its time and millions of dollars rather than all Australians who are in need. Is that not a form of discrimination?
US President Joe Biden: “If there were not an Israel, we’d have to invent one.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HZs-v0PR44
Report comment
Welcome, one and all, to the new financial year! To rising electricity prices and food prices and everything prices! Inflation eating away at your retirement savings! All due to the pollimuppets, together with the pubic serpents, of the Uniparty. Oh, and for good measure, let’s have a serious division (da ‘Voice’) in our society.
Report comment
You said it, Mak. The blackfellas knew
Also heard on the wireless, male public serpents to get 5 months paid paternity leave. Didn’t hear where.
Report comment
Mind you it opens a whole new business franchise
As long as it tastes like chicken
Report comment
Advice from an agony aunt column that gets to the point
Actions have consequences
Report comment
Victorian of the year
Report comment
Refuting the dot points
• Died with based on tests that are not diagnostic.
• Underlying cause of death is not cause of death
• No it didn’t
• Most Convid deaths were actually heart failure
• People otherwise in the best of health
Further down
Only 187 vaccine deaths? What about the 20,000 excess deaths?
And nowhere is the vax status recorded. Just criminal.
Report comment
Pauline’s done it again
Report comment
“His father, Celestino Mayor, is….of Philippine and Dayak (Borneo) ancestry and his mother, Liz Mayor, brings Polish, Jewish and English ancestry to the family.”
Another Bruce.
Report comment
Report comment
Update
Report comment
Elon Musk takes two steps forward and then two steps back. He needs to work out his goal for Twitter and how he plans to run it. He talks about Free Speech and willing to lose money over it, but then makes decisions that contradict what he says.
He has made some poor recruitment choices, especially the CEO. It would have been easy to get some good executives for his top positions, at lower remuneration packages, since there will be many conservative techies who would change jobs to work for a Free Speech tech company.
Now, it seems, he is blocking unregistered users in the hope that they will sign up and join Twitter. He says the reason is because:
If he does not unblock this quickly, it will backfire as many will just walk away from the platform. And those who are account holders and posters will lose their readers and thus their viewing numbers.
Report comment
These are paywalled articles so I don’t know the details, but the blurbs provide clues.
1/
Janet Albrechtsen
Worried about the voice? Wait until you see the treaty
2/
Geoffrey Blainey
Before voice vote, let’s get the facts in order
3/
From an article yesterday, we hear that the Yes 23 activist group is planning to enlist 50,000 volunteers for its campaign. They will be pushing the message of how the Voice will help indigenous health and education. And the group wants to steer clear of any questions related to the mechanics of the Voice.
So, as always, the left use the emotion over reason, the feelz over think. Make it an emotional issue and use blackmail.
The list of questions keeps getting longer. Let’s get some queries on the billions of dollars already given to various indigenous groups, precisely for health and education. Where has the money gone? If it hasn’t helped the indigenous so far, how can we be sure it will help them when they have the Voice?
I’ve heard the figure of 30+ billion dollars each year that is given out for indigenous causes. Is there a verification source for the amount? I have been unable to find a link.
Report comment
Did the New World Order/Great Reset agenda begin 50-60 years ago?
Or was it much earlier?
Who are the real power brokers in this world? Were the “symbols” described in the video connected to some people, places and events? Planned or some coincidences? Or misinterpretations? What is the truth? What is conspiracy?
Best Modern Exposure Of Freemasonry
Time To Wake Up Saints
This video was posted in 2021. A description states:
From Wikipedia.
Report comment
I don’t have a Twitter account but always post and link to tweets on the Cat.
Until yesterday.
And no, I won’t be creating an account.
Report comment
The heyday of Freemasonry is well and truly in the past. It is not clear if this Altiyan chap is referring to Masons since the beginning or recently, and I’m not listening to five hours of his presentation to find out.
I will say that it is very, very unlikely that old time Masons had anything to do with Satanism. I knew quite a few of them in my younger days, and it’s laughable.
Masonry was big in the north of England, and members were typically devout Chapel types. Satanism? Nup.
If there are some creepy elements in the meagre remnants of the Freemasons these days – meh.
Report comment
Powerline’s The Week in Pictures: Halfway Point Edition
Report comment
Tara Reade: Biden accuser explains why she decided to flee the US and seek sanctuary in Russia
https://www.rt.com/news/578904-tara-reade-russia-moscow/
Report comment
Where’s the white Aussie…………………???????
Sitting outside with a sign and cap ..!
[Comment went to the Spam bin. Can’t see why. – Admin]
Report comment
Diversity building
New keyboard saves me a lot of time on the net
Report comment
ABC today
That’s called an oxymoron.
She’ll have fries with that
Report comment
Flight cancellations at Sydney airport over the last day or so due to wind strength. Can’t see why
They’re lying.
Report comment
I don’t buy it
Report comment
Janet Albrechtsen
Worried about the voice? Wait until you see the treaty
A Yes vote in the referendum is not the end of the process but rather the starting gun to a long and divisive treaty
From behind the paywall – Janet Albrechtsen quotes the words of the radical activists which have been reported elsewhere but summarises the agenda thus:
Report comment
Elon throttling the users on his own platform?
WTF does this mean?
To address extreme levels of data scraping & system manipulation, we’ve applied the following temporary limits:
– Verified accounts are limited to reading 6000 posts/day
– Unverified accounts to 600 posts/day
– New unverified accounts to 300/day
Report comment
The former US Marine demonstrating how the US regime is full of it
Report comment
Geoff Blainey Article in Paywallian
Historian Geoffrey Blainey is the author of more than 40 books. His recent memoir is called Before I Forget (Penguin).
Report comment
Most Masons just think that it’s a harmless charitable boy’s club with some dressing up in silly aprons etc., it’s not until they get to the 33rd degree that they are told that they worship Lucifer.
The majority of the members never know about the core beliefs of that organisation, they just join to advance their prospects in life.
Report comment
A proud Cobble Cobble woman, more likely a proud gobble gobble woman.
Report comment
Troy Bramston in The Australian arguing that Donald Trump Jr. should not be admitted to Australia
I look forward to Joe and Hunter Biden being refused as convicted felons
Report comment
Are the Aboriginals going to sort out this ongoing mess on K’gari?
Report comment
Paywalled
I recall same thing happened last year.
The new normal.
Report comment
Will the public learn from the trickery of the past?
2017: Same Sex Marriage. Love is Love.
2017 – 2023: It wasn’t about love or marriage.
The No side in 2017 knew where the slippery slope was headed. But even they would not have guessed how bad it would be.
2023: Voice referendum
The No side knows it isn’t about equality. It is about another agenda.
Report comment
I don’t have Twitter or Instagram accounts. But I was able to open a link to this Instagram post and can also share it here. In the past two days, Twitter seems to be in a mess even for those with accounts.
Sarah Huckabee Sanders
Report comment
Woolfe, thanks for posting that excellent opinion piece from Geoffrey Blainey. It is a pity that it is a paywalled article. If it had a link, it could be shared widely. There must be some way to do it.
Historical facts and statistics against the falsehoods spread by the activist brigade.
Report comment
The point you make about Masons thinking it is a harmless club and thinking it would help their prospects would explain why many get into it. The plan would be to reel them in gently and, once in the trap, it would be hard to get out.
There are several commenters who agree with what Altiyan has said in his video. They have had personal experience directly or through family members who have been masons. Some have vouched for it due to their own study and research into this cult.
Two comments:
Report comment
Merci Macron et les autres
Un
Deux
Trois ha ha
Report comment
The socially engineered banking system in Britain.
Coming soon to a bank near you.
1/
Neil Oliver
To be deprived of a bank account is to be the victim of social murder.
Neil Oliver reacts to Nigel Farage having his bank account closed ‘without explanation’.
2/
The Vicar
Yorkshire Building Society CLOSES Vicar’s bank account after airing views on bank’s Pride agenda
Report comment
How far did Queen Elizabeth 2 get?
Report comment
The regime won’t stop until they are stopped
Report comment
The Voice Questions
(Draft list)
These are the ones so far from the blog Cats. If you have other questions that can be added, please post them. The list will be updated and revised.
1/ Just who is indigenous?
2/ Is Bruce Pascoe indigenous?
3/ What standards will be applied to acknowledge indigenousness?
(Notes: It used to be a threefold test: the ‘three-part’ definition of Aboriginal identity
“An Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander is a person *of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent
*who identifies as an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander and
*is accepted as such by the community in which he (she) lives.”)
4/ What will be the direct cost to taxpayers of not just the peak body, but all the processes associated with appointing it and maintaining it?
5/ What will be the indirect costs resulting from delayed decisions, foregone wealth from cancelled projects, and legal challenges from both sides?
6/ What are the quantifiable benefits to offset the above costs?
7/ If you don’t know the answers to the above (Qs 4, 5, 6) how can you responsibly ask people to vote for it?
8/ As our indigenous brothers and sisters have the same voting rights as I do, why should some people have extra privileges in shaping and influencing legislation than I do? i.e., they already have the same “voice” as I have. They can complain to their elected representative in the same manner as I can, and they would be equally ignored like me too. Equality.
9/ If the referendum passes, how will the members of the Voice Advisory panel be selected? Will there be a voting process based on some rules?
10/ The non-indigenous Australians are expected to respect and acknowledge the indigenous people as the first inhabitants of this country. Is the same not due by indigenous people to the rest of the Australians for what they contribute to help the indigenous people?
11/ Each year, over 30 billion dollars is given by the government to help indigenous people? That is a huge amount of money. Taxpayers need to know what has happened to their tax dollars.
12/ In 2023, middle Australia is struggling with the cost of living: paying grocery bills, rent or mortgage, medical bills, power bills. There are Australians – both indigenous and non-indigenous – who are homeless, ill, unable to work, can’t afford to pay their bills – yet the government considers the indigenous Voice to Parliament as a far more important issue worth its time and millions of dollars rather than all Australians who are in need. Is that not a form of discrimination?